It is valid to purify a woman from excrement by istijmaar; That is, the removal of impurity with stones and what replaces them, and the use of water is not required by the agreement of the jurists. That is, the one who did not lose her virginity through marriage, without the previously-married woman - who lost her virginity through marriage -, and the reason for limiting the permissibility of the virgin without the non-virgin: that the virgin is the place where the virginity is closed, so urine does not attach to it and does not reach it, so it is permissible for her to istijmaar without using water, and as for the non-virgin, this is the place She has a breakout when she sits down to urinate, which may lead to urine reaching him, so she is obliged, accordingly, to use water to purify him. And whoever says that it is obligatory to use water for purification from the urine of women, it is also obligatory to pour water on the place in a pouring manner, and not just spray it or wipe it with water. Because the purpose of purification is to remove the trace of the urine that comes out, so if it is removed by pouring water without using the hand to wipe the place, that is permissible, otherwise the hand must be passed with water on the place to remove the trace.